Global Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market by Product

Global Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market Based on Application
Global Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market Based on Region
Europe
North America
Asia Pacific
Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Scope & Assumptions
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
Chapter 3. Global Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market Snapshot
Chapter 4. Global Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market Variables, Trends & Scope
4.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
4.2. Market Dynamics - Drivers
4.3. Challenges/Restraints
4.4. Market Trends
4.5. Industry Analysis – Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.6. Competitive Landscape & Market Share Analysis
Chapter 5. Market Segmentation 1: Product Type Estimates & Trend Analysis
5.1. Product Type & Market Share, 2024 & 2034
5.2. Market Size (Value) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following Product Type:
5.2.1. Skincare
5.2.2. Haircare
5.2.3. Make-up
5.2.4. Fragrances
5.2.5. Others
Chapter 6. Market Segmentation 1: Service Estimates & Trend Analysis
6.1. Service & Market Share, 2024 & 2034
6.2. Market Size (Value) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following Service:
6.2.1. Consultation/digital questionnaires
6.2.2. Apps and specialized hardware
6.2.3. Home test kits
6.2.4. Others
Chapter 7. Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market Segmentation 3: Regional Estimates & Trend Analysis
7.1. North America
7.1.1. North America Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Product Type, 2021-2034
7.1.2. North America Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
7.1.3. North America Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by country, 2021-2034
7.1.3.1. U.S.
7.1.3.2. Canada
7.2. Europe
7.2.1. Europe Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Product Type, 2021-2034
7.2.2. Europe Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
7.2.3. Europe Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2021-2034
7.2.3.1. Germany
7.2.3.2. Poland
7.2.3.3. France
7.2.3.4. Italy
7.2.3.5. Spain
7.2.3.6. UK
7.2.3.7. Rest of Europe
7.3. Asia Pacific
7.3.1. Asia Pacific Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Product Type, 2021-2034
7.3.2. Asia Pacific Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
7.3.3. Asia Pacific Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2021-2034
7.3.3.1. China
7.3.3.2. India
7.3.3.3. Japan
7.3.3.4. Australia
7.3.3.5. Rest of Asia Pacific
7.4. Latin America
7.4.1. Latin America Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Product Type, 2021-2034
7.4.2. Latin America Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
7.4.3. Latin America Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, (US$ Million) 2021-2034
7.4.3.1. Brazil
7.4.3.2. Rest of Latin America
7.5. MEA
7.5.1. MEA Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Product Type, 2021-2034
7.5.2. MEA Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
7.5.3. MEA revenue Next-Generation Personalized Beauty Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, (US$ Million) 2021-2034
7.5.3.1. South Africa
7.5.3.2. Rest of MEA
Chapter 8. Competitive Landscape
8.1. Major Mergers and Acquisitions/Strategic Alliances
8.2. Company Profiles
8.2.1. AN EPIGENCARE BRAND
8.2.2. AUGUST SKINCARE
8.2.3. Beiersdorf (NIVEA SKiN GUiDE)
8.2.4. BITE Beauty
8.2.5. CODAGE
8.2.6. Coty Inc.
8.2.7. Curology
8.2.8. DermaCare
8.2.9. Duolab
8.2.10. EpigenCare Inc.
8.2.11. eSalon
8.2.12. Estée Lauder Inc.
8.2.13. FitSkin Inc
8.2.14. Function of Beauty LLC
8.2.15. HautAI
8.2.16. insitU Cosmetics Ltd.
8.2.17. IOMA Paris
8.2.18. Kiehl’s Apothecary Preparations
8.2.19. Krigler
8.2.20. L’Oréal’s (Modiface, Hair Coach)
8.2.21. Laboté
8.2.22. Luna Fofo
8.2.23. My Beauty Matches
8.2.24. mySkin
8.2.25. Nioxin
8.2.26. Nomige
8.2.27. NU S.KIN
8.2.28. Olay (Skin Care App)
8.2.29. Perfect Corp
8.2.30. Preemadonna Inc.
8.2.31. Prose
8.2.32. Proven Skincare
8.2.33. Revieve
8.2.34. Shiseido (Optune System)
8.2.35. Skin Authority
8.2.36. Skin Inc.
8.2.37. SkinAI LLC (Our Skin)
8.2.38. SkinCeuticals Custom D.O.S.E.
8.2.39. SKINSHIFT
8.2.40. SKINTELLI
8.2.41. Ulta Beauty, Inc.
8.2.42. Yours Skincare
8.2.43. Othe Prominent Players
This study employed a multi-step, mixed-method research approach that integrates:
This approach ensures a balanced and validated understanding of both macro- and micro-level market factors influencing the market.
Secondary research for this study involved the collection, review, and analysis of publicly available and paid data sources to build the initial fact base, understand historical market behaviour, identify data gaps, and refine the hypotheses for primary research.
Secondary data for the market study was gathered from multiple credible sources, including:
These sources were used to compile historical data, market volumes/prices, industry trends, technological developments, and competitive insights.
Primary research was conducted to validate secondary data, understand real-time market dynamics, capture price points and adoption trends, and verify the assumptions used in the market modelling.
Primary interviews for this study involved:
Interviews were conducted via:
Primary insights were incorporated into demand modelling, pricing analysis, technology evaluation, and market share estimation.
All collected data were processed and normalized to ensure consistency and comparability across regions and time frames.
The data validation process included:
This ensured that the dataset used for modelling was clean, robust, and reliable.
The bottom-up approach involved aggregating segment-level data, such as:
This method was primarily used when detailed micro-level market data were available.
The top-down approach used macro-level indicators:
This approach was used for segments where granular data were limited or inconsistent.
To ensure accuracy, a triangulated hybrid model was used. This included:
This multi-angle validation yielded the final market size.
Market forecasts were developed using a combination of time-series modelling, adoption curve analysis, and driver-based forecasting tools.
Given inherent uncertainties, three scenarios were constructed:
Sensitivity testing was conducted on key variables, including pricing, demand elasticity, and regional adoption.