Global Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market Based on Product
Global Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market Based on Disease Type
Global Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market Based on Region
Europe Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market by Country
North America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market by Country
Asia Pacific Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market by Country
Latin America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market by Country
Middle East & Africa Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market by Country
Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Scope & Assumptions
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
Chapter 3. Global Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market Snapshot
Chapter 4. Global Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market Variables, Trends & Scope
4.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
4.2. Drivers
4.3. Challenges
4.4. Trends
4.5. Penetration & Growth Prospect Mapping
4.6. Clinical Trial/Pipeline Analysis
4.7. Industry Analysis – Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.8. Competitive Landscape & Market Share Analysis
4.9. Technology Advancement in Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market
Chapter 5. Market Segmentation 1: Product Estimates & Trend Analysis
5.1. Product Type & Market Share, 2020 & 2028
5.2. Market Size (Value US$ Mn) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2020 to 2028 for the following Product:
5.2.1. Zolgensma
5.2.2. Invossa K
5.2.3. Strimvelis
5.2.4. Neovasculgen
5.2.5. Glybera
5.2.6. Luxturna
5.2.7. Zynteglo
5.2.8. Others
Chapter 6. Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market Segmentation 2: Application Estimates & Trend Analysis
6.1. Disease Type Analysis & Market Share, 2020 & 2028
6.2. Market Size (Value US$ Mn) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2020 to 2028 for the following Disease Type:
6.2.1. Human Medicine
6.2.2. Human Medicine
6.2.3. Hemophilia
6.2.4. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
6.2.5. Achromatopsia
6.2.6. Cystic Fibrosis
6.2.7. Inherited Retinal Dystrophy
6.2.8. Fragile X Syndrome
6.2.9. Friedreich ataxia
6.2.10. Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
6.2.11. Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria
6.2.12. Retinitis Pigmentosa
6.2.13. Others
Chapter 7. Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market Segmentation 3: Regional Estimates & Trend Analysis
7.1. North America
7.1.1. North America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by product, 2020-2028
7.1.2. North America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by Disease Type, 2020-2028
7.1.3. North America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts by country, 2020-2028
7.1.3.1. U.S.
7.1.3.2. Canada
7.2. Europe
7.2.1. Europe Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by product, 2020-2028
7.2.2. Europe Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by Disease Type, 2020-2028
7.2.3. Europe Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2020-2028
7.2.3.1. Germany
7.2.3.2. Poland
7.2.3.3. France
7.2.3.4. Italy
7.2.3.5. Spain
7.2.3.6. UK
7.2.3.7. Rest of Europe
7.3. Asia Pacific
7.3.1. Asia Pacific Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by product, 2020-2028
7.3.2. Asia Pacific Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by Disease Type, 2020-2028
7.3.3. Asia Pacific Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2020-2028
7.3.3.1. China
7.3.3.2. India
7.3.3.3. Japan
7.3.3.4. Australia
7.3.3.5. Rest of Asia Pacific
7.4. Latin America
7.4.1. Latin America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by product, (US$ Million)
7.4.2. Latin America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by Disease Type, (US$ Million)
7.4.3. Latin America Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, (US$ Million) 2020-2028
7.4.3.1. Brazil
7.4.3.2. Rest of Latin America
7.5. MEA
7.5.1. MEA revenue Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by product, (US$ Million) 2020-2028
7.5.2. MEA Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by Disease Type, (US$ Million)
7.5.3. MEA Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, (US$ Million) 2020-2028
Chapter 8. Competitive Landscape
8.1. Company Profiles
8.1.1. 4d Molecular Therapeutics, LLC
8.1.2. Abeona Therapeutics Inc.
8.1.3. Advaxis
8.1.4. Adverum Biotech
8.1.5. Aevi Genomic
8.1.6. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation (AGTC)
8.1.7. Alcyone Lifesciences
8.1.8. Allife Medical Science and Technology
8.1.9. Amarna Therapeutics
8.1.10. American Gene Technologies
8.1.11. Amgen
8.1.12. Amicus Therapeutics
8.1.13. Anchiano Therapeutics
8.1.14. AnGes MG
8.1.15. Apic Bio
8.1.16. Armata Pharmaceuticals
8.1.17. Arrowhead
8.1.18. Arthrogen
8.1.19. Asklepios
8.1.20. Astellas
8.1.21. AVROBIO
8.1.22. BCM Families Foundation
8.1.23. Beijing Northland
8.1.24. Benitec
8.1.25. Biogen
8.1.26. BioMarin
8.1.27. Biosidus
8.1.28. bluebird bio
8.1.29. Boryung Group
8.1.30. Brain Neurotherapeuticsy Bio
8.1.31. Celsion Corporation
8.1.32. Chiesi
8.1.33. CRISPR Therapeutics
8.1.34. CSL Behring
8.1.35. Daewoong Pharma
8.1.36. Dicerna
8.1.37. Editas Medicine
8.1.38. Eiger BioPharmaceuticals
8.1.39. Enzo Therapeutics
8.1.40. Esteve
8.1.41. Evox Therapeutics
8.1.42. Expression Therapeutics
8.1.43. Fibrocell
8.1.44. Flexion Therapeutics,
8.1.45. Fortress Biotech
8.1.46. Freeline Therapeutics
8.1.47. Gene Biotherapeutics
8.1.48. Genenta Science
8.1.49. GeneQuine
8.1.50. Genethon
8.1.51. GenSight
8.1.52. Gilead
8.1.53. Gradalis
8.1.54. GSK
8.1.55. Hanugen
8.1.56. Helixmith
8.1.57. Herantis
8.1.58. ID Pharma
8.1.59. Immusoft
8.1.60. Inovio
8.1.61. Intellia Therapeutics
8.1.62. Intrexon
8.1.63. Juventas
8.1.64. Kolon Life Science
8.1.65. Krystal Biotech
8.1.66. Locana
8.1.67. LogicBio Therapeutics
8.1.68. Lysogene
8.1.69. Medigene
8.1.70. MeiraGTx
8.1.71. Miltenyi Biotec
8.1.72. Molecular Templates
8.1.73. Momotaro-Gene
8.1.74. Neuralgene
8.1.75. Novartis
8.1.76. OncoSec
8.1.77. Orchard Therapeutics
8.1.78. Oxford Biomedica
8.1.79. Pfizer
8.1.80. Prevail Therapeutics
8.1.81. PTC Therapeutics
8.1.82. REGENXBIO
8.1.83. Renova Therapeutics
8.1.84. Reyon Pharmaceutical
8.1.85. Roche
8.1.86. Rocket Pharma
8.1.87. Roivant
8.1.88. Sangamo Therapeutics
8.1.89. Sarepta Therapeutics
8.1.90. Seelos Therapeutics
8.1.91. Solid BioSciences
8.1.92. Sterna Biologicals
8.1.93. Sutura Therapeutics
8.1.94. SynerGene
8.1.95. Takara
8.1.96. Takeda
8.1.97. Talee Bio
8.1.98. Theragene Pharma
8.1.99. Transgene
8.1.100. Ultragenyx
8.1.101. uniQure
8.1.102. VBL Therapeutics
8.1.103. Vertex
8.1.104. Voyager Therapeutics
8.1.105. Xalud
8.1.106. Xenon
8.1.107. Ziopharm
This study employed a multi-step, mixed-method research approach that integrates:
This approach ensures a balanced and validated understanding of both macro- and micro-level market factors influencing the market.
Secondary research for this study involved the collection, review, and analysis of publicly available and paid data sources to build the initial fact base, understand historical market behaviour, identify data gaps, and refine the hypotheses for primary research.
Secondary data for the market study was gathered from multiple credible sources, including:
These sources were used to compile historical data, market volumes/prices, industry trends, technological developments, and competitive insights.
Primary research was conducted to validate secondary data, understand real-time market dynamics, capture price points and adoption trends, and verify the assumptions used in the market modelling.
Primary interviews for this study involved:
Interviews were conducted via:
Primary insights were incorporated into demand modelling, pricing analysis, technology evaluation, and market share estimation.
All collected data were processed and normalized to ensure consistency and comparability across regions and time frames.
The data validation process included:
This ensured that the dataset used for modelling was clean, robust, and reliable.
The bottom-up approach involved aggregating segment-level data, such as:
This method was primarily used when detailed micro-level market data were available.
The top-down approach used macro-level indicators:
This approach was used for segments where granular data were limited or inconsistent.
To ensure accuracy, a triangulated hybrid model was used. This included:
This multi-angle validation yielded the final market size.
Market forecasts were developed using a combination of time-series modelling, adoption curve analysis, and driver-based forecasting tools.
Given inherent uncertainties, three scenarios were constructed:
Sensitivity testing was conducted on key variables, including pricing, demand elasticity, and regional adoption.