eHealth 2.0 Market Size Was valued at USD 347.5 Bn in 2024 and is predicted to reach USD 851.5 Bn by 2034 at a 9.7% CAGR during the forecast period for 2025-2034.
The term eHealth 2.0 refers to the most recent advancement in digital health. Along with improving the efficiency of healthcare delivery, real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, patient empowerment, and personalized treatment are all given top priority. The characteristics that set eHealth 2.0 apart from earlier digital health strategies are its collaborative and interactive aspects. The increasing need for AI-based medical solutions, digital health records, and remote healthcare services is driving rapid growth in the eHealth 2.0 market. Both the rising cost of healthcare and government initiatives promoting digital healthcare are driving adoption. With the widespread use of mobile devices and internet connectivity, the shift to digital healthcare platforms has been accelerated. More innovation in this field is anticipated to be fueled by emerging technologies like cloud computing, AI, and IoT.
Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the use of remote monitoring and telemedicine, leading to increased spending on digital healthcare solutions. eHealth 2.0 is anticipated to play a crucial role in enhancing the efficiency and accessibility of healthcare, particularly in light of the ageing population and growing concerns about chronic diseases. The eHealth 2.0 industry is expected to continue developing steadily in the long run as insurers, pharmaceutical companies, and healthcare providers adopt digital transformation.
The eHealth 2.0 market is segmented based on service, type, indication, and end-user. Based on service, the market is segmented into monitoring, diagnostic, and treatment. By type, the market is segmented into telemedicine, electronic health records (ehrs), mhealth, e-prescription, remote patient monitoring, health information exchange (hie), and others. By end-user, the market is segmented into healthcare providers, insurers, and others.
The monitoring segment is expected to hold a major global market share in 2024. The expansion of this market is anticipated to be driven by the rising demand for self-monitoring devices that automatically track vital signs and a variety of physical activities while building a database. The market has been divided into segments based on services, including health empowerment, diagnostics, and monitoring. Vital signs, specialization, adherence tracking, and accessories are all included in the monitoring sector.
In healthcare, the two primary e-environments where the concerns of inequality can be described are telemedicine and e-health. Telemedicine is the practice of providing medical care when the patient and the healthcare provider are not in the same physical area. It is a clinical pathway that establishes remote digital interactive connections for clinical diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation. The present e-health and telemedicine practices have brought even more attention to the need for a deeper understanding of how to prevent marginalization and advance fairness.
The North American eHealth 2.0 market is expected to register the highest market share in revenue in the near future. The US's large senior population and the rising prevalence of numerous chronic illnesses have greatly fueled the expansion of the eHealth 2.0 market. Furthermore, the North American eHealth 2.0 industry has been bolstered by rising healthcare spending, greater acceptance of digital technology, and high disposable income. In addition, Asia Pacific is projected to grow rapidly in the global eHealth 2.0 market. The existence of a large number of platforms is favorably influencing the expansion of the market. The need for eHealth 2.0 platforms is being driven by the growing government spending on the creation of advanced, digital healthcare infrastructure. Additionally, the region's eHealth 2.0 market is anticipated to increase due to the quickly increasing senior population and the rising prevalence of various ailments.
|
Report Attribute |
Specifications |
|
Market Size Value In 2024 |
USD 347.5 Bn |
|
Revenue Forecast In 2034 |
USD 851.5 Bn |
|
Growth Rate CAGR |
CAGR of 9.7% from 2025 to 2034 |
|
Quantitative Units |
Representation of revenue in US$ Bn and CAGR from 2025 to 2034 |
|
Historic Year |
2021 to 2024 |
|
Forecast Year |
2025-2034 |
|
Report Coverage |
The forecast of revenue, the position of the company, the competitive market structure, growth prospects, and trends |
|
Segments Covered |
By Service, By Type, By Indication, and By End-User |
|
Regional Scope |
North America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Latin America; Middle East & Africa |
|
Country Scope |
U.S.; Canada; U.K.; Germany; China; India; Japan; Brazil; Mexico; France; Italy; Spain; South East Asia; South Korea |
|
Competitive Landscape |
Boston Scientific Corporation, Veradigm LLC, Oracle Cerner, CVS Health, Athenahealth Inc., American Well, iCliniq, Medtronic, Epocrates, Medisafe, IBM, Doximity, Inc., Teladoc Health, Inc., LiftLabs, CompuMed Inc., Set Point Medical, Epic Systems Corporation, GE Healthcare, Telecare Corporation, Optum Health, Siemens Healthineers, eClinicalWorks, UnitedHealth Group, Koninklijke Philips NV, and other. |
|
Customization Scope |
Free customization report with the procurement of the report and modifications to the regional and segment scope. Particular Geographic competitive landscape. |
|
Pricing And Available Payment Methods |
Explore pricing alternatives that are customized to your particular study requirements. |
Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Scope & Assumptions
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
Chapter 3. Global eHealth 2.0 Market Snapshot
Chapter 4. Global eHealth 2.0 Market Variables, Trends & Scope
4.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
4.2. Drivers
4.3. Challenges
4.4. Trends
4.5. Investment and Funding Analysis
4.6. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.7. Incremental Opportunity Analysis (US$ MN), 2025-2034
4.8. Global eHealth 2.0 Market Penetration & Growth Prospect Mapping (US$ Mn), 2024-2034
4.9. Competitive Landscape & Market Share Analysis, By Key Player (2024)
4.10. Use/impact of AI on eHealth 2.0 Market Industry Trends
Chapter 5. eHealth 2.0 Market Segmentation 1: By Type, Estimates & Trend Analysis
5.1. Market Share by Type, 2024 & 2034
5.2. Market Size (Value (US$ Mn) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following Type:
5.2.1. Telemedicine
5.2.2. Electronic Health Records (EHRS)
5.2.3. E-Prescription
5.2.4. Remote Patient Monitoring
5.2.5. mHealth
5.2.6. Health Information Exchange (HIE)
5.2.7. Others
Chapter 6. eHealth 2.0 Market Segmentation 2: By Service, Estimates & Trend Analysis
6.1. Market Share by Service, 2024 & 2034
6.2. Market Size (Value (US$ Mn) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following Service:
6.2.1. Monitoring
6.2.2. Diagnostic
6.2.3. Treatment
Chapter 7. eHealth 2.0 Market Segmentation 3: By End User, Estimates & Trend Analysis
7.1. Market Share by End User, 2024 & 2034
7.2. Market Size (Value (US$ Mn) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following End User:
7.2.1. Healthcare Providers
7.2.2. Insurers
7.2.3. Others
Chapter 8. eHealth 2.0 Market Segmentation 4: Regional Estimates & Trend Analysis
8.1. Global eHealth 2.0 Market , Regional Snapshot 2024 & 2034
8.2. North America
8.2.1. North America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
8.2.1.1. US
8.2.1.2. Canada
8.2.2. North America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Type, 2021-2034
8.2.3. North America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
8.2.4. North America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by End User, 2021-2034
8.3. Europe
8.3.1. Europe eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
8.3.1.1. Germany
8.3.1.2. U.K.
8.3.1.3. France
8.3.1.4. Italy
8.3.1.5. Spain
8.3.1.6. Rest of Europe
8.3.2. Europe eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Type, 2021-2034
8.3.3. Europe eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
8.3.4. Europe eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by End User, 2021-2034
8.4. Asia Pacific
8.4.1. Asia Pacific eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
8.4.1.1. India
8.4.1.2. China
8.4.1.3. Japan
8.4.1.4. Australia
8.4.1.5. South Korea
8.4.1.6. Hong Kong
8.4.1.7. Southeast Asia
8.4.1.8. Rest of Asia Pacific
8.4.2. Asia Pacific eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Type, 2021-2034
8.4.3. Asia Pacific eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
8.4.4. Asia Pacific eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by End User, 2021-2034
8.5. Latin America
8.5.1. Latin America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
8.5.1.1. Brazil
8.5.1.2. Mexico
8.5.1.3. Rest of Latin America
8.5.2. Latin America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Type, 2021-2034
8.5.3. Latin America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
8.5.4. Latin America eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by End User, 2021-2034
8.6. Middle East & Africa
8.6.1. Middle East & Africa eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by country, 2021-2034
8.6.1.1. GCC Countries
8.6.1.2. Israel
8.6.1.3. South Africa
8.6.1.4. Rest of Middle East and Africa
8.6.2. Middle East & Africa eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Type, 2021-2034
8.6.3. Middle East & Africa eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by Service, 2021-2034
8.6.4. Middle East & Africa eHealth 2.0 Market Revenue (US$ Mn) Estimates and Forecasts by End User, 2021-2034
Chapter 9. Competitive Landscape
9.1. Major Mergers and Acquisitions/Strategic Alliances
9.2. Company Profiles
9.2.1. Boston Scientific Corporation
9.2.1.1. Business Overview
9.2.1.2. Key Product/Service
9.2.1.3. Financial Performance
9.2.1.4. Geographical Presence
9.2.1.5. Recent Developments with Business Strategy
9.2.2. Veradigm LLC
9.2.3. Oracle Cerner
9.2.4. CVS Health
9.2.5. Athenahealth Inc.
9.2.6. American Well
9.2.7. iCliniq
9.2.8. Medtronic
9.2.9. Epocrates
9.2.10. Medisafe
9.2.11. IBM
9.2.12. Doximity, Inc.
9.2.13. Teladoc Health, Inc.
9.2.14. LiftLabs
9.2.15. CompuMed Inc.
9.2.16. Set Point Medical
9.2.17. Epic Systems Corporation
9.2.18. GE Healthcare
9.2.19. Telecare Corporation
9.2.20. Optum Health
9.2.21. Siemens Healthineers
9.2.22. Veradigm LLC
9.2.23. eClinicalWorks
9.2.24. NITEDHEALTH GROUP
9.2.25. Koninklijke Philips NV
eHealth 2.0 Market-By Service
eHealth 2.0 Market-By Type
eHealth 2.0 Market-By End-User
eHealth 2.0 Market-By Region
North America-
Europe-
Asia-Pacific-
Latin America-
Middle East & Africa-
InsightAce Analytic follows a standard and comprehensive market research methodology focused on offering the most accurate and precise market insights. The methods followed for all our market research studies include three significant steps – primary research, secondary research, and data modeling and analysis - to derive the current market size and forecast it over the forecast period. In this study, these three steps were used iteratively to generate valid data points (minimum deviation), which were cross-validated through multiple approaches mentioned below in the data modeling section.
Through secondary research methods, information on the market under study, its peer, and the parent market was collected. This information was then entered into data models. The resulted data points and insights were then validated by primary participants.
Based on additional insights from these primary participants, more directional efforts were put into doing secondary research and optimize data models. This process was repeated till all data models used in the study produced similar results (with minimum deviation). This way, this iterative process was able to generate the most accurate market numbers and qualitative insights.
Secondary research
The secondary research sources that are typically mentioned to include, but are not limited to:
The paid sources for secondary research like Factiva, OneSource, Hoovers, and Statista
Primary Research:
Primary research involves telephonic interviews, e-mail interactions, as well as face-to-face interviews for each market, category, segment, and subsegment across geographies
The contributors who typically take part in such a course include, but are not limited to:
Data Modeling and Analysis:
In the iterative process (mentioned above), data models received inputs from primary as well as secondary sources. But analysts working on these models were the key. They used their extensive knowledge and experience about industry and topic to make changes and fine-tuning these models as per the product/service under study.
The standard data models used while studying this market were the top-down and bottom-up approaches and the company shares analysis model. However, other methods were also used along with these – which were specific to the industry and product/service under study.
To know more about the research methodology used for this study, kindly contact us/click here.
