Global Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Type of Service
Global Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Animal Type
Global Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Region
North America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Country
Europe Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Country
Asia Pacific Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Country
Latin America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Country
Middle East & Africa Companion Animal Digital Technology Market, by Country
Competitive Landscape
Latest Strategic Developments
Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Scope & Assumptions
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
Chapter 3. Global Companion Animal Digital Technology Market Snapshot
Chapter 4. Global Companion Animal Digital Technology Market Variables, Trends & Scope
4.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
4.2. Drivers
4.3. Challenges
4.4. Trends
4.5. Investment and Funding Analysis
4.6. Industry Analysis – Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.7. Competitive Landscape & Market Share Analysis
4.8. Impact of Covid-19 Analysis
Chapter 5. Market Segmentation 1: By Route of Administration, Estimates & Trend Analysis
5.1. By Service Types, & Market Share, 2024 & 2034
5.2. Market Size (Value US$ Mn) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following By Service Types:
5.2.1. Telemedicine
5.2.2. Telehealth
5.2.3. Reminder applications
5.2.4. Trackers
5.2.5. Wearables
5.2.6. Platform Market Places
Chapter 6. Market Segmentation 2: By Technology Estimates & Trend Analysis
6.1. By Animal Types & Market Share, 2024 & 2034
6.2. Market Size (Value US$ Mn) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following By Animal Types
6.2.1. Dogs
6.2.2. Equine
6.2.3. Cats
6.2.4. Other Animal Types
Chapter 7. Companion Animal Digital Technology Market Segmentation 3: Regional Estimates & Trend Analysis
7.1. North America
7.1.1. North America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts By Service Types, 2021-2034
7.1.2. North America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) estimates and forecasts By Animal Types, 2021-2034
7.1.3. North America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2021-2034
7.2. Europe
7.2.1. Europe Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Service Types, 2021-2034
7.2.2. Europe Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Animal Types, 2021-2034
7.2.3. Europe Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2021-2034
7.3. Asia Pacific
7.3.1. Asia Pacific Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Service Types, 2021-2034
7.3.2. Asia Pacific Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Animal Types, 2021-2034
7.3.3. Asia Pacific Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2021-2034
7.4. Latin America
7.4.1. Latin America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Service Types, 2021-2034
7.4.2. Latin America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Animal Types, 2021-2034
7.4.3. Latin America Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2021-2034
7.5. Middle East & Africa
7.5.1. Middle East & Africa Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Service Types, (US$ Million) 2021-2034
7.5.2. Middle East & Africa Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) By Animal Types, (US$ Million) 2021-2034
7.5.3. Middle East & Africa Companion Animal Digital Technology Market revenue (US$ Million) by country, 2021-2034
Chapter 8. Competitive Landscape
8.1. Major Mergers and Acquisitions/Strategic Alliances
8.2. Company Profiles
8.2.1. AVID Identification Systems
8.2.2. Datamars, Inc.
8.2.3. EIDAP Inc.
8.2.4. Findster
8.2.5. FitBark
8.2.6. Gibi Technologies
8.2.7. Link AKC
8.2.8. Loc8tor
8.2.9. Marco Polo
8.2.10. Microchip4Solutions Inc.
8.2.11. Nuzzle
8.2.12. PawPrint
8.2.13. Pethealth Inc.
8.2.14. PetPace
8.2.15. PetSafe
8.2.16. Squeaker Buddy
8.2.17. Sure Petcare (SureFlap Ltd)
8.2.18. Tractive
8.2.19. Trovan, Ltd.
8.2.20. Whistle (Tagg)
8.2.21. WUF
8.2.22. 11 PETS LTD.
8.2.23. DogLog
8.2.24. Intervet Inc. (Merck & Co.)
8.2.25. Pawprint Inc.
8.2.26. PetCare
8.2.27. Petriage
8.2.28. PetDesk
8.2.29. V2P2 LLC
8.2.30. VetCheck App
8.2.31. Vethical
8.2.32. Virtual Recall
8.2.33. VitusVet
8.2.34. Dogstar Life
8.2.35. Dogtra
8.2.36. EYENIMAL
8.2.37. Felcana
8.2.38. FitBark
8.2.39. Fuzzy – The Pet Parent Company
8.2.40. Garmin International, Inc.
8.2.41. GoPro (Fetch)
8.2.42. i4C Innovations
8.2.43. INUPATHY, Inc.
8.2.44. Kyon
8.2.45. Link AKC
8.2.46. Loc8tor Ltd.
8.2.47. Milkline
8.2.48. Motorola
8.2.49. NUM'AXES S.A.
8.2.50. PetPace
8.2.51. Pitpatpet Ltd.
8.2.52. Scollar, Inc.
8.2.53. TekVet Technologies Co.
8.2.54. Tractive
8.2.55. Whistle Labs
8.2.56. Other Prominent Players
This study employed a multi-step, mixed-method research approach that integrates:
This approach ensures a balanced and validated understanding of both macro- and micro-level market factors influencing the market.
Secondary research for this study involved the collection, review, and analysis of publicly available and paid data sources to build the initial fact base, understand historical market behaviour, identify data gaps, and refine the hypotheses for primary research.
Secondary data for the market study was gathered from multiple credible sources, including:
These sources were used to compile historical data, market volumes/prices, industry trends, technological developments, and competitive insights.
Primary research was conducted to validate secondary data, understand real-time market dynamics, capture price points and adoption trends, and verify the assumptions used in the market modelling.
Primary interviews for this study involved:
Interviews were conducted via:
Primary insights were incorporated into demand modelling, pricing analysis, technology evaluation, and market share estimation.
All collected data were processed and normalized to ensure consistency and comparability across regions and time frames.
The data validation process included:
This ensured that the dataset used for modelling was clean, robust, and reliable.
The bottom-up approach involved aggregating segment-level data, such as:
This method was primarily used when detailed micro-level market data were available.
The top-down approach used macro-level indicators:
This approach was used for segments where granular data were limited or inconsistent.
To ensure accuracy, a triangulated hybrid model was used. This included:
This multi-angle validation yielded the final market size.
Market forecasts were developed using a combination of time-series modelling, adoption curve analysis, and driver-based forecasting tools.
Given inherent uncertainties, three scenarios were constructed:
Sensitivity testing was conducted on key variables, including pricing, demand elasticity, and regional adoption.