Remote Catheter Manipulation Device Market is expected to grow at a 6.5% CAGR during the forecast period for 2025-2034.
Key Industry Insights & Findings from the Report:
Radiation exposure is a serious concern during fluoroscopic procedures like electrophysiology (EP) studies and radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. Ablation is a definitive treatment in many patients compared to antiarrhythmic drugs. Ablation procedures require mobile catheters inside the cardiac chambers and vascular system to recognize the arrhythmia substrate prior to ablation. Proper catheter manipulation requires a skilled electrophysiologist working under fluoroscopic guidance. This may result in significant X-ray exposure, which is a risk for both patients and medical staff. Operators typically don lead aprons to protect themselves from radiation, but wearing lead can result in greater fatigue and orthopedic injury during long procedures. To overcome this problem, robotic catheter systems, controlled mechanically are introduced in the market.
Products in the market include Niobe, VDrive, Sensei X, Amigo RCS, etc. Vdrive system consists of V-Sono ICE catheter manipulator and V-Loop variable loop catheter manipulator. Amigo was approved by the FDA for use in diagnostic EP studies of the right atrium and ventricle in 2012, with this indication later expanded in 2014 to include radiofrequency ablations. The research is ongoing to help accurately detect catheter movements with the help of a laser mouse-based master device. By laser sensor, the catheter’s position changes can be obtained.
The catheter manipulation devices are segmented based on indication, type of catheter, and geography. On the basis of indication the devices are further sub-segmented into electrophysiology studies, Vascular Interventional Surgery, and RF catheter ablation. The ablation process needs a special ablation catheter. Catheter ablation is the most popularly used procedure for Arrhythmias, having a high success rate. EP studies are used either to diagnose arrhythmias or to assist in cardiac ablation procedures and hence will hold a higher market share. This subsegment is expected to grow the fastest due to the increased establishment of EP labs every year in the United States.
On the basis of types of catheter, the devices are segmented into, Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE), ablation catheter, and circular mapping catheter. The standard ICE catheter utilizes a linear array of crystals arranged longitudinally along the catheter to produce a fan-shaped image radiating coplanar to the long axis of the catheter. The ablation catheter is adjusted to the proper position by the operator, and the machine sends either RF waves, extremely cold temperatures, or laser light through it to make a scar, called an ablation line. Manipulator for circular mapping catheter is responsible for advancement, retraction, rotation, tip deflection, and loop size of the catheter. The circular mapping catheter manipulator is used to remotely control both the circular mapping catheter and the ablation catheter this leads to improved procedure outcomes, hence this is expected to gain market share over single ICE and ablation catheter manipulators.
Geographically the global market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. In 2014 North America accounted for the largest share of the market. Europe followed North America on account of revenue. The Asia-Pacific market is expected to grow due to the increasing aging population, improving and modernizing healthcare infrastructure, and high demand for electrophysiology devices, with a special focus on countries like India, China, and Japan.
A number of factors such as the development of technologically advanced catheter manipulation devices, increasing aging population with a high risk of cardiovascular diseases, increasing incidence of arrhythmia cases across the globe, growing focus of key market players to expand their geographic presence, and growing demand of ablation procedures drives the growth of the global market.
Report Attribute |
Specifications |
Growth Rate CAGR |
CAGR of 6.5% from 2025 to 2034 |
Quantitative Units |
Representation of revenue in US$ Million, Volume (Unit), and CAGR from 2025 to 2034 |
Historic Year |
2021 to 2024 |
Forecast Year |
2025-2034 |
Report Coverage |
The forecast of revenue, the position of the company, the competitive market structure, growth prospects, and trends |
Segments Covered |
By Type of Catheter, By Indication, |
Regional Scope |
North America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Latin America; Middle East & Africa |
Country Scope |
U.S.; Canada; U.K.; Germany; China; India; Japan; Brazil; Mexico; The UK; France; Italy; Spain; South Korea; South East Asia |
Competitive Landscape |
Proven process medical devices, Sterotaxis, Inc., Hansen Medical, Catheter Precision Inc., Boston scientific, Biosense Webster, and Others |
Customization Scope |
Free customization report with the procurement of the report, Modifications to the regional and segment scope. Particular Geographic competitive landscape. |
Pricing and Available Payment Methods |
Explore pricing alternatives that are customized to your particular study requirements. |
Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Scope & Assumptions
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
Chapter 3. Global Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Snapshot
Chapter 4. Global Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Variables, Trends & Scope
4.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
4.2. Drivers
4.3. Challenges
4.4. Trends
4.5. Investment and Funding Analysis
4.6. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.7. Incremental Opportunity Analysis (US$ MN), 2025-2034
4.8. Global Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Penetration & Growth Prospect Mapping (US$ Mn), 2024-2034
4.9. Competitive Landscape & Market Share Analysis, By Key Player (2024)
4.10. Use/impact of AI on Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Industry Trends
Chapter 5. Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Segmentation 1: By Type of Catheter, Estimates & Trend Analysis
5.1. Market Share by Type of Catheter, 2024 & 2034
5.2. Market Size (Value (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units)) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following Type of Catheter:
5.2.1. Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE)
5.2.2. Ablation Catheter
5.2.3. Circular Mapping Catheter
Chapter 6. Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Segmentation 2: By Indication
6.1. Market Share by Indication, 2024 & 2034
6.2. Market Size (Value (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units)) & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2034 for the following Indication:
6.2.1. Electrophysiology Studies
6.2.2. Vascular Interventional Surgery
6.2.3. Rf Catheter Ablation
Chapter 7. Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Segmentation 3: Regional Estimates & Trend Analysis
7.1. Global Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market, Regional Snapshot 2024 & 2034
7.2. North America
7.2.1. North America Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
7.2.1.1. US
7.2.1.2. Canada
7.2.2. North America Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Type of Catheter, 2021-2034
7.2.3. North America Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Indication, 2021-2034
7.3. Europe
7.3.1. Europe Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
7.3.1.1. Germany
7.3.1.2. U.K.
7.3.1.3. France
7.3.1.4. Italy
7.3.1.5. Spain
7.3.1.6. Rest of Europe
7.3.2. Europe Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Type of Catheter, 2021-2034
7.3.3. Europe Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Indication, 2021-2034
7.4. Asia Pacific
7.4.1. Asia Pacific Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
7.4.1.1. India
7.4.1.2. China
7.4.1.3. Japan
7.4.1.4. Australia
7.4.1.5. South Korea
7.4.1.6. Hong Kong
7.4.1.7. Southeast Asia
7.4.1.8. Rest of Asia Pacific
7.4.2. Asia Pacific Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Type of Catheter, 2021-2034
7.4.3. Asia Pacific Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Indication, 2021-2034
7.5. Latin America
7.5.1. Latin America Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Country, 2021-2034
7.5.1.1. Brazil
7.5.1.2. Mexico
7.5.1.3. Rest of Latin America
7.5.2. Latin America Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Type of Catheter, 2021-2034
7.5.3. Latin America Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Indication, 2021-2034
7.6. Middle East & Africa
7.6.1. Middle East & Africa Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by country, 2021-2034
7.6.1.1. GCC Countries
7.6.1.2. Israel
7.6.1.3. South Africa
7.6.1.4. Rest of Middle East and Africa
7.6.2. Middle East & Africa Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Type of Catheter, 2021-2034
7.6.3. Middle East & Africa Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Revenue (US$ Mn) & Volume (Units) Estimates and Forecasts by Indication, 2021-2034
Chapter 8. Competitive Landscape
8.1. Major Mergers and Acquisitions/Strategic Alliances
8.2. Company Profiles
8.2.1. Proven process medical devices
8.2.1.1. Business Overview
8.2.1.2. Key Product/Service
8.2.1.3. Financial Performance
8.2.1.4. Geographical Presence
8.2.1.5. Recent Developments with Business Strategy
8.2.2. Sterotaxis, Inc
8.2.3. Hansen Medical
8.2.4. Catheter Precision Inc
8.2.5. Boston scientific
8.2.6. Biosense Webster
8.2.7. Other Prominent Players
Global Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Outlook (Value (US$ Mn) and Volume (No. of Units), By Type of Catheter
Global Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Market Outlook (Value (US$ Mn) and Volume (No. of Units), By Indication
Global Remote Catheter Manipulation Devices Outlook (Value (US$ Mn) and Volume (No. of Units), By Region
InsightAce Analytic follows a standard and comprehensive market research methodology focused on offering the most accurate and precise market insights. The methods followed for all our market research studies include three significant steps – primary research, secondary research, and data modeling and analysis - to derive the current market size and forecast it over the forecast period. In this study, these three steps were used iteratively to generate valid data points (minimum deviation), which were cross-validated through multiple approaches mentioned below in the data modeling section.
Through secondary research methods, information on the market under study, its peer, and the parent market was collected. This information was then entered into data models. The resulted data points and insights were then validated by primary participants.
Based on additional insights from these primary participants, more directional efforts were put into doing secondary research and optimize data models. This process was repeated till all data models used in the study produced similar results (with minimum deviation). This way, this iterative process was able to generate the most accurate market numbers and qualitative insights.
Secondary research
The secondary research sources that are typically mentioned to include, but are not limited to:
The paid sources for secondary research like Factiva, OneSource, Hoovers, and Statista
Primary Research:
Primary research involves telephonic interviews, e-mail interactions, as well as face-to-face interviews for each market, category, segment, and subsegment across geographies
The contributors who typically take part in such a course include, but are not limited to:
Data Modeling and Analysis:
In the iterative process (mentioned above), data models received inputs from primary as well as secondary sources. But analysts working on these models were the key. They used their extensive knowledge and experience about industry and topic to make changes and fine-tuning these models as per the product/service under study.
The standard data models used while studying this market were the top-down and bottom-up approaches and the company shares analysis model. However, other methods were also used along with these – which were specific to the industry and product/service under study.
To know more about the research methodology used for this study, kindly contact us/click here.