Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit Market Size and Revenue Impact Study 2025 to 2034
Share With :
Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit Market Size is valued at USD 5.7 Bn in 2024 and is predicted to reach USD 48.7 Bn by the year 2034 at a 24.1% CAGR during the forecast period for 2025 to 2034.
Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Credit Type (Biodiversity Credits (Habitat/Ecosystem Conservation Credits, Restoration Credits, Species Conservation Credits, Avoided Loss Credits), Natural Capital Credits (Carbon Sequestration, Soil Quality Improvement, Watershed Services, Pollination Services), Hybrid/Bundled Credits (Combined Carbon and Biodiversity Credits, Landscape-level Conservation Credits, Ecosystem Service Packages)), by Region, And by Segment Forecasts, 2025 to 2034
A market approach that places a monetary value on the conservation and restoration of ecosystems and biodiversity is the Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit. Although they are a component of larger environmental credit schemes, such as carbon credits, these credits are especially aimed at protecting species, habitats, and ecosystem services like pollination, clean water, and healthy soil. The market is expected to grow as a result of increasing net-positive biodiversity goals and corporate ESG commitments, government policies and regulations that support biodiversity protection, consumer demand for eco-friendly products, growing investor interest in natural capital as an asset class, and international frameworks such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Furthermore, although terrestrial ecosystems have received a lot of attention, freshwater and marine areas are becoming increasingly important for preserving biodiversity worldwide. There is a significant unrealized growth potential when finance markets are extended into these ecosystems.
However, there are some factors which anticipated to impede this market's growth like lack of standardized metrics and measurement methodologies, a lack of regulatory frameworks in many regions, high costs and market fragmentation, difficulties in guaranteeing long-term conservation outcomes; and issues with verification and additionality. Additionally, by offering a uniform and widely available platform, blockchain-based solutions can aid in the international exchange of natural capital credits. These technologies will be essential to the development of sustainable environmental practices, biodiversity protection, and investments in natural capital projects as the market grows.
The Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit market is segmented based on credit type. Based on credit type, the market is segmented into Biodiversity Credits (Habitat/Ecosystem Conservation Credits, Restoration Credits, Species conservation Credits, Avoided Loss Credits), Natural Capital Credits (Carbon Sequestration, Soil Quality Improvement, Watershed Services, Pollination Services), and Hybrid/Bundled Credits (Combined Carbon and Biodiversity Credits, Landscape-level Conservation Credits, Ecosystem Service Packages).
The Biodiversity Credits category is expected to hold a major global market share in 2024 due to the growing need for ecosystem preservation and awareness of the need to lessen the effects of human activity and climate change on biodiversity. The conservation of natural ecosystems is receiving significant funding from both public and corporate sectors, and regional regulatory frameworks are increasingly conforming to biodiversity conservation objectives. As companies are urged to strike a balance between environmental responsibility and economic growth, these credits are also being incorporated into corporate sustainability plans more frequently.
Europe Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit market is expected to register the highest market share in revenue in the near future driven by robust legal systems, established environmental standards, and significant financial investments in sustainability and conservation projects. Because of the European Union's Green Deal, which aims to reduce carbon emissions & preserve biodiversity, the market has expanded. Moreover, Leading the way in utilizing biodiversity and natural capital credits to support environmental preservation and climate goals are nations like France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Additionally, this region gains from an expanding number of firms and investors who are keen to accomplish sustainability goals through reliable environmental credit systems.
| Report Attribute | Specifications |
| Market Size Value In 2024 | USD 5.7 Bn |
| Revenue Forecast In 2034 | USD 48.7 Bn |
| Growth Rate CAGR | CAGR of 24.1% from 2025 to 2034 |
| Quantitative Units | Representation of revenue in US$ Bn and CAGR from 2025 to 2034 |
| Historic Year | 2021 to 2024 |
| Forecast Year | 2025-2034 |
| Report Coverage | The forecast of revenue, the position of the company, the competitive market structure, growth prospects, and trends |
| Segments Covered | By Credit Type |
| Regional Scope | North America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Latin America; Middle East & Africa |
| Country Scope | U.S.; Canada; U.K.; Germany; China; India; Japan; Brazil; Mexico; France; Italy; Spain; South East Asia; South Korea |
| Competitive Landscape | Terrasos SAS, BioCarbon Partners LP., EcoEnterprises Fund, Zero Imprint Ltd., Ekos K?mahi Ltd, Climate Asset Management Limited, Biodiversity Solutions Ltd, GreenCollar Group, Earthbanc, DGB GROUP N.V., The Landbanking Group, ClimateTrade, Wildlife Works Services, Nature Metrics Ltd, New Forests Advisory Pty Limited, GreenVest, CreditNature Ltd, and South Pole |
| Customization Scope | Free customization report with the procurement of the report and modifications to the regional and segment scope. Particular Geographic competitive landscape. |
| Pricing And Available Payment Methods | Explore pricing alternatives that are customized to your particular study requirements. |
Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit Market By Credit Type-
Biodiversity and Natural Capital Credit Market By Region-
North America-
Europe-
Asia-Pacific-
Latin America-
Middle East & Africa-
This study employed a multi-step, mixed-method research approach that integrates:
This approach ensures a balanced and validated understanding of both macro- and micro-level market factors influencing the market.
Secondary research for this study involved the collection, review, and analysis of publicly available and paid data sources to build the initial fact base, understand historical market behaviour, identify data gaps, and refine the hypotheses for primary research.
Secondary data for the market study was gathered from multiple credible sources, including:
These sources were used to compile historical data, market volumes/prices, industry trends, technological developments, and competitive insights.
Primary research was conducted to validate secondary data, understand real-time market dynamics, capture price points and adoption trends, and verify the assumptions used in the market modelling.
Primary interviews for this study involved:
Interviews were conducted via:
Primary insights were incorporated into demand modelling, pricing analysis, technology evaluation, and market share estimation.
All collected data were processed and normalized to ensure consistency and comparability across regions and time frames.
The data validation process included:
This ensured that the dataset used for modelling was clean, robust, and reliable.
The bottom-up approach involved aggregating segment-level data, such as:
This method was primarily used when detailed micro-level market data were available.
The top-down approach used macro-level indicators:
This approach was used for segments where granular data were limited or inconsistent.
To ensure accuracy, a triangulated hybrid model was used. This included:
This multi-angle validation yielded the final market size.
Market forecasts were developed using a combination of time-series modelling, adoption curve analysis, and driver-based forecasting tools.
Given inherent uncertainties, three scenarios were constructed:
Sensitivity testing was conducted on key variables, including pricing, demand elasticity, and regional adoption.