Global Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market Size is predicted to develop a 14.2% CAGR during the forecast period for 2025 to 2034.
Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market, Share & Trends Analysis Report, By Service Type (In-house Regulatory Affairs, Outsourced Regulatory Affairs), By Application (Oncology, Rare Diseases, Genetic Disorders, Other Applications), By Therapy Type, By Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2025 to 2034
Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) involves overseeing the development, submission, and compliance of regulatory documentation to ensure that CGT products meet the safety, efficacy, and quality standards set by global health authorities such as the FDA, EMA, and others. This field navigates the unique challenges of CGTs, which are often complex, personalized therapies involving genetic material or patient-specific cells, and therefore, require tailored regulatory frameworks.
A critical early step is determining whether the product is classified as a somatic cell therapy, gene therapy, tissue-engineered product, or a combination product, as this classification dictates the regulatory pathway. Regulatory Affairs Management for CGT is a highly specialized function that demands interdisciplinary expertise in regulatory science, biotechnology, quality systems, and clinical strategy to ensure timely and compliant product development and approval.
Gene therapy is rapidly transforming the landscape of medical treatment for a wide range of complex disorders, and with its advancement, the role of regulatory affairs has expanded significantly to ensure these novel therapies meet rigorous safety and efficacy standards. The growing number of gene therapy clinical trials and regulatory approvals highlights the momentum in this field. For instance, the steady increase in gene therapy Investigational New Drug (IND) applications submitted to the FDA reflects the field's growth and regulatory engagement. Landmark approvals, such as Luxturna for retinal dystrophy and Zolgensma for spinal muscular atrophy, showcase regulatory agencies' willingness to embrace innovative treatments, which in turn has fueled further research and investment.
A notable early milestone was the 2012 approval of Glybera in Europe for lipoprotein lipase deficiency (LPLD), which, despite its groundbreaking nature, faced substantial regulatory scrutiny, including rigorous safety monitoring and post-market requirements. Similarly, Luxturna's approval in the U.S. followed extensive clinical trials and careful alignment with evolving FDA guidelines. These pioneering cases not only paved the way for subsequent gene therapies but also helped refine regulatory frameworks, creating a more structured and predictable environment for future development.
Some of the Major Key Players in the Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market are:
The regulatory affairs management for the cell and gene therapy market is segmented based on service type, application, and therapy type. Based on service type, the market is segmented into in-house regulatory affairs and outsourced regulatory affairs. Based on the application, the market is divided into oncology, rare diseases, genetic disorders, and other applications. Based on the therapy type, the market is divided into cell therapy, gene therapy, and gene-modified cell therapy.
Based on service type, the market is segmented into in-house regulatory affairs and outsourced regulatory affairs. Among these, the outsourced regulatory affairs segment is expected to have the highest growth rate during the forecast period. The cell and gene therapy (CGT) market heavily favors outsourced regulatory affairs over in-house regulatory affairs management, with outsourcing holding the largest share. The CGT sector relies extensively on Contract Development and Manufacturing Organizations (CDMOs) and Contract Research Organizations (CROs) for regulatory tasks due to the need for expertise in navigating complex, evolving regulatory frameworks like those of the FDA and EMA. Outsourcing offers cost savings of 50-80% compared to in-house operations, alongside access to specialized regulatory knowledge critical for CGT, such as compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and managing long-term safety data requirements.
Based on the therapy type, the market is divided into cell therapy, gene therapy, and gene-modified cell therapy. Among these, the gene-modified cell therapy segment dominates the market. Gene-modified cell therapies involve both cellular manipulation and genetic engineering, requiring oversight for both cell therapy and gene therapy. This dual complexity increases the demand for regulatory affairs expertise, including Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) documentation and risk management. This segment, which includes therapies like CAR-T cell therapies (e.g., Kymriah, Yescarta), commands the largest share of regulatory affairs management due to its rapid growth and complex regulatory requirements.
North America leads the global biologics regulatory affairs outsourcing market, driven by stringent regulations and a high concentration of biologics manufacturers. The U.S. FDA, with its collaborative engagement (e.g., RMAT, Breakthrough Designation), fosters innovation and simplifies market entry. Hundreds of biotech companies and CDMOs are based in the U.S., creating economies of scale and demand for regulatory and manufacturing services. CGT regulatory affairs, supported by a mature biotech ecosystem, robust regulatory support, and comprehensive infrastructure across development, manufacturing, and clinical domains.
| Report Attribute | Specifications |
| Growth Rate CAGR | CAGR of 14.2% from 2025 to 2034 |
| Quantitative Units | Representation of revenue in US$ Bn and CAGR from 2025 to 2034 |
| Historic Year | 2021 to 2024 |
| Forecast Year | 2025-2034 |
| Report Coverage | The forecast of revenue, the position of the company, the competitive market structure, growth prospects, and trends |
| Segments Covered | By Service Type, Application, Therapy Type |
| Regional Scope | North America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Latin America; Middle East & Africa |
| Country Scope | U.S.; Canada; U.K.; Germany; China; India; Japan; Brazil; Mexico; The UK; France; Italy; Spain; China; Japan; India; South Korea; Southeast Asia; South Korea; South East Asia |
| Competitive Landscape | Novartis AG, Amgen Inc, Pfizer Inc, Biogen Inc, Gilead Sciences Inc, Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Bayer AG, AstraZeneca PLC, Lonza Group Ltd, Catalent, Inc, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc, WuXi AppTec, IQVIA Holdings Inc, Parexel International Corporation, Syneos Health, Inc, PPD, Inc, CMIC Group |
| Customization Scope | Free customization report with the procurement of the report and modifications to the regional and segment scope. Particular Geographic competitive landscape. |
| Pricing and Available Payment Methods | Explore pricing alternatives that are customized to your particular study requirements. |
Segmentation of Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market
Global Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market - By Service Type
Global Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market – By Application
Global Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market By Therapy Type
Global Regulatory Affairs Management for Cell and Gene Therapy Market – By Region
North America-
Europe-
Asia-Pacific-
Latin America-
Middle East & Africa-
This study employed a multi-step, mixed-method research approach that integrates:
This approach ensures a balanced and validated understanding of both macro- and micro-level market factors influencing the market.
Secondary research for this study involved the collection, review, and analysis of publicly available and paid data sources to build the initial fact base, understand historical market behaviour, identify data gaps, and refine the hypotheses for primary research.
Secondary data for the market study was gathered from multiple credible sources, including:
These sources were used to compile historical data, market volumes/prices, industry trends, technological developments, and competitive insights.
Primary research was conducted to validate secondary data, understand real-time market dynamics, capture price points and adoption trends, and verify the assumptions used in the market modelling.
Primary interviews for this study involved:
Interviews were conducted via:
Primary insights were incorporated into demand modelling, pricing analysis, technology evaluation, and market share estimation.
All collected data were processed and normalized to ensure consistency and comparability across regions and time frames.
The data validation process included:
This ensured that the dataset used for modelling was clean, robust, and reliable.
The bottom-up approach involved aggregating segment-level data, such as:
This method was primarily used when detailed micro-level market data were available.
The top-down approach used macro-level indicators:
This approach was used for segments where granular data were limited or inconsistent.
To ensure accuracy, a triangulated hybrid model was used. This included:
This multi-angle validation yielded the final market size.
Market forecasts were developed using a combination of time-series modelling, adoption curve analysis, and driver-based forecasting tools.
Given inherent uncertainties, three scenarios were constructed:
Sensitivity testing was conducted on key variables, including pricing, demand elasticity, and regional adoption.